Crony Capitalism Keeps Cancer Patients from Care

April 26, 2011 at 7:44 am | Posted in Political | Leave a comment
Tags: , , , , , ,

As a foreshadowing of the sort of government intervention which will ration care and cost lives as Obamacare is implemented, the House Health and Human Services Reform Committee shall today consider HF383, a bill which would extend a moratorium on radiation clinics until 2017.

The moratorium protects a government-enforced monopoly for Minneapolis Radiation Oncology. MRO has a doctor whose political contributions, when combined with his wife’s, make them to the 19th largest contributor in the state. Here’s what that influence buys them:

  • Minnesota law currently FORBIDS the construction of new cancer radiation therapy clinics.

NYT Abandons Journalism: Compares Jon Stewart to Edward R. Murrow

December 27, 2010 at 11:00 am | Posted in NewsRealBlog | Leave a comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

by Walter Hudson, contributed to NewsReal Blog

Former Nightline anchor Ted Koppel rocked the proverbial boat in November. Responding to Keith Olbermann’s brief suspension for making a few undisclosed campaign contributions, Koppel wondered why MSNBC was bothering to feign a lack of bias.

…when Olbermann draws more than 1 million like-minded viewers to his program every night precisely because he is avowedly, unabashedly and monotonously partisan, it is not clear what misdemeanor his donations constituted. Consistency?

Koppel railed against the trend in news media toward opinion-shaping and away from the reporting of fact. Koppel hit a nerve, evoking defensive replies from the cable news crowd.

Now, in an unwitting vindication of Koppel’s argument, The New York Times sees fit to knight The Daily Show’s Jon Stewart for “advocacy journalism” on behalf of the 9/11 Health and Compensation Act of 2010.

Read on at NewsReal Blog

“V” Is For Victory: 10 Brazenly Conservative Themes in ABC’s Alien Invasion Remake

October 18, 2010 at 1:34 am | Posted in NewsRealBlog | Leave a comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

by Walter Scott Hudson, contributed to NewsReal Blog

It’s not the kind of entertainment you’ve come to expect from Hollywood. ABC’s remake of the 1983 television miniseries V tackles plainly modern issues from a decisively conservative perspective.

Though the science fiction and fantasy genres are often utilized to comment on controversial political issues, the messages conveyed are typically left of center. Star Trek is perhaps the consummate example of a science fiction show which impressed upon its audience a leftist view of culture, religion, and politics. Its back-story presented an Earth which had progressed beyond divisions of race, nationality, religion, and politics. The United Federation of Planets was a stand in for the United Nations, portrayed as a wholly benevolent entity unburdened by corruption. The message was explict. This can be our future. We can cast off sin through sheer force of will and craft a post-modern utopia. Continue Reading “V” Is For Victory: 10 Brazenly Conservative Themes in ABC’s Alien Invasion Remake…

On Health Care, Jack Black and America Ferrera Think You Are An Idiot

October 14, 2010 at 4:39 am | Posted in NewsRealBlog | Leave a comment
Tags: , , , , , , ,

by Walter Scott Hudson, contributed to NewsReal Blog

Opponents of Obamacare should take heart. The Left is clearly nervous about the unpopularity of their scheme and the calls still reverberating to repeal and replace it. Otherwise, why would they spend good money producing a YouTube video staring Hollywood celebrities to promote a bill which is already law?

The advocacy organization Health Care for America Now (HCAN) recently posted the video featuring Jack Black as Nathan Spewman, a professional liar who goes undercover as an eight-year-old at an elementary school to spread “misinformation” about Obamacare at the behest of “greedy corporations.” America Ferrera plays the teacher of the class he infiltrates.

It’s no Drunk History, but showcases Black’s typical cartoonish form. It also stands as a blistering insult to the intelligence of its intended audience.

Read on at NewsReal Blog

North Star Tea Party Patriots Reaches Out to MinnPost Readers

September 25, 2010 at 8:17 am | Posted in Political | Leave a comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, MinnPost published an article attempting to demystify the Tea Party movement for their readers. Writer Doug Grow sat down with three board members of the recently launched North Star Tea Party Patriots, including this writer, to get a feel for where the movement has been, where it is at, and wheter it will be here tomorrow. Based on the comment section, it’s fair to say MinnPost’s readership tends slightly left of center. What follows is my resposne to their comments.

I’d like to thank Doug Grow for chatting with us and writing this article. One of the points we discussed which he wasn’t able to squeeze in is that the polarization in our current political dialogue is unproductive. The fact that we disagree does not make one side or the other ignorant, uneducated, or somehow evil. Grow, a writer who certainly does not share the Tea Party paradigm, was nonetheless able to engage us in a cordial conversation which included substantive debate.

One of the goals of the North Star Tea Party Patriots is to create opportunities to dialogue directly with individuals and groups who hold opposing political views. Too often, we let our media have the conversation for us, or allow the anonymity of the internet to tempt us toward name-calling instead of honest discussion.  Continue Reading North Star Tea Party Patriots Reaches Out to MinnPost Readers…

Could Bringing Politicians Home Increase Accountability?

March 29, 2010 at 6:48 am | Posted in Political | Leave a comment
Tags: , , , , ,

by Walter Scott Hudson, contributed to the New Patriot Journal

Days after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the New America Foundation presented a plan to Congress to relocate its members to their home districts and conduct business via teleconference. The impetus for the plan at that time was national security. To this day, there remains speculation regarding the intended target of United Airlines Flight 93. Had it crashed into Capitol Hill, the legislative branch may have been critically affected. Decentralizing Congress, it was argued, would ensure the continuity of government against a localized attack.

Obviously, the plan went no where. Congress continues to conduct business in a localized setting. However, the concept is now being revisited by a group of activists led by Michael Norbury of bringhomethepoliticans.com. While national security remains a selling point, the primary objective has shifted to accountability. “The goal is to setup an ‘e-Congress, which [would] relocate US representatives to their local districts, US senators to their state capitols, and state representatives and senators to their city halls and court houses, to securely telecommute for no less than 75% of their terms,” Norbury detailed in a radio interview with Fightin Words. “A good way to describe this is sort of a permanent ‘August recess,’ where instead of going home for a week or two, they’ll be going to [the capitol] every once in a while throughout the year.”

Continue Reading Could Bringing Politicians Home Increase Accountability?…

Civil Rights May Be Bad For Your Health

March 24, 2010 at 6:21 am | Posted in Political | 11 Comments
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

by Walter Scott Hudson

During the initial Democratic afterglow following the House passage of Obamacare, Representative Jim Clyburn of South Carolina repeated the fallacious progressive claim that healthcare is a fundamental human right.

I said earlier, during my talk on the floor, that I consider this to be the Civil Rights Act of the 21st century – because I do believe that this is the one fundamental right that this country had been wrestling with now for almost a hundred years. I think tonight, we took a giant step toward the establishment of a more perfect union.

Clyburn’s equating a healthcare entitlement to the civil rights established in 1964 is deeply insulting. To understand why, one must consider how the adjective “civil” affects the noun “right,” and the function civil rights play in a just society. The term “civil rights” has become interchangeable,  in the public discourse, with the term “inalienable rights.” These distinct concepts have become so convoluted, even popular internet references group them together. Continue Reading Civil Rights May Be Bad For Your Health…

Eleventh Hour Protesters Accused of Racism, Homophobia

March 21, 2010 at 6:21 am | Posted in Political | 2 Comments
Tags: , , ,

by Walter Scott Hudson

This morning’s Washington Post contains a report summarizing the last minute political wrangling surrounding tonight’s vote on President Obama’s government takeover of healthcare. Protesters gathered in Washington, hoping against hope to have their voice heard by those servants elected to the Hill, were characterized thus:

Throughout the day, thousands of angry protesters milled outside the Capitol; some hurled insults at black and gay lawmakers and shouted at Democrats to “kill the bill!” Meanwhile, Obama made a final pitch for reform, exhorting wavering lawmakers to rise to the aid of millions of uninsured Americans by taking “the single most important step that we have taken on health care since Medicare” was created in 1965.

The Republican message was being received loud and clear outside the Capitol, where angry protesters gathered and waved placards that said “Defeat Obamacare” and “Born in the USA not the USSR.” Republicans were treated as heroes as they walked through the crowds, who patted them on the back and thanked them for their opposition. Democrats were greeted with jeers.

Continue Reading Eleventh Hour Protesters Accused of Racism, Homophobia…

Tyranny Built With Rights

March 17, 2010 at 6:10 am | Posted in Political | 1 Comment
Tags: , , , , ,

by Walter Scott Hudson

On his television program Monday night, Glenn Beck highlighted the subjugation of “faith, hope, and charity” by the Left to gain support for contrived rights like universal healthcare. Sob stories are utilized to leverage proper emotional response toward improper governmental action. Underlying this theater is the fundamental principle articulated in the Declaration of Independence. “All men are created equal… endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights.” At work in our society today is a wholly contradictory position, articulated last December by Senator Tom Harkin of Iowa, and revisted Monday by Beck.

What [the healthcare] bill does is… We take that step from healthcare as a privilege to healthcare as an alienable right of every single American citizen. As I have said before, this bill is not complete. I’ve used the analogy of a starter home in which we can add additions and enhancements as we go into the future. But, like every other right that we’ve ever passed the American people, we revisit it later to enhance and build on those rights… (emphasis added)

This statement is antithetical to the Declaration of Independence. Rather than endowment by their Creator, Harkin believes all men are granted rights from government, that rights are “enhanced” by government.

Continue Reading Tyranny Built With Rights…

A Greater Generation Will Fight Domestic War

March 16, 2010 at 9:01 am | Posted in Political | 7 Comments
Tags: , , , , ,

by Walter Scott Hudson

Throughout the debate on health care reform, which is poised to culminate this week in a House vote on the Senate bill, progressive commentators have pointed to the precedents of Social Security and Medicare to justify their agenda. A government takeover of health care is no more socialist than these previous programs, they say, and is therefore as American as apple pie. “America has been a social welfare state for a long time,” wrote Daniel Weingartner in a University of Tennessee publication. “During the Great Depression, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Social Security bill into law, giving assistance to millions in desperate need.”

Some have taken the point further, saying those opposed to a government takeover of health care are hypocritical to support other entitlement programs. “[Their strategy] puts Republicans in the odd position of blasting away at the public plan at the same time that they’re adamantly defending the virtues of Medicare,” wrote Mike Lillis in an August article for the Minnesota Independent. “[Medicare is] the working definition of government-backed health care.” These observations hint at a political hot potato which must eventually be owned by conservatives.

Continue Reading A Greater Generation Will Fight Domestic War…

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 38 other followers